| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
John Miller
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 10:05 am Post subject: Re: FRITZ!Box Fon (Annex A) |
 |
|
| Quote: |
BE CAREFUL!
A different patching way is needed to patch fritz box fon 7050
which works with AVM latest german firmware (xx.xx.31).
|
I thought there was no patch available yet for firmware 14.04.30 and
14.04.31 to annex A? Can you please give me a link for that?
The only way I know to get a German 14.04.30 or 14.04.31 to work with Annex
A is to downgrade it to 14.04.26, and then apply the Annex-A patch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
SBS
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 4:09 pm Post subject: Re: FRITZ!Box Fon (Annex A) |
|
|
John Miller (johnmiller@nospamplease.com) ha scritto:
:: The only way I know to get a German 14.04.30 or 14.04.31
:: to work with Annex A is to downgrade it to 14.04.26, and
:: then apply the Annex-A patch.
Of course, you can downgrade the latest firmware to a
previous one (e.g. 14.04.31 to 14.04.26) but the way to do that
is quite difficult and dangerous because you have to move the
fritzbox bootloader between two different memory blocks.
If you make any mistakes during those steps, then you could
only get a technological-well-designed ornament for your
living room ;-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
SBS
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 5:39 pm Post subject: Re: FRITZ!Box Fon (Annex A) |
|
|
John Miller (johnmiller@nospamplease.com) ha scritto:
:: But you didn't reply to my question: can you please tell me
:: how you did what you wrote here:
:::: A different patching way is needed to patch fritz box fon 7050
:::: which works with AVM latest german firmware (xx.xx.31).
The answer was in my previous message.
You should have to move the fritzbox bootloader between two
different memory blocks.
Don't you know how? Write me an email: saintofsky@gmail.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
John Miller
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 5:42 pm Post subject: Re: FRITZ!Box Fon (Annex A) |
|
|
| Quote: |
If you make any mistakes during those steps, then you could
only get a technological-well-designed ornament for your
living room ;-)
|
Luckely after the downgrade I was still able to use it in the way it was
originaly meant :-)
But you didn't reply to my question: can you please tell me how you did what
you wrote here:
| Quote: |
A different patching way is needed to patch fritz box fon 7050
which works with AVM latest german firmware (xx.xx.31).
|
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Mark
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 4:44 pm Post subject: Re: Incoming Pots -> VoIP Forwarding |
|
|
On Sat, 19 May 2007 19:43:44 GMT, "mr deo"
<rstlne@atatwhereherewheretherehuyeh.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
I have had several modems in the past that had great incoming voice featues
(you could set up menus and even allow users to have voice commands).. This
got me to wondering "if" there's a soft (or cheap(ish) hard) solution out
there. and if such solutions are out there then how good are they? ..
I would accept the fact that I'll get longer latency times, but fixed plans
on the mobiles means I can call home essentially free, so it would be a
great way to forward those incoming mobi phones over VoIP and save a bundle
 ..
Thanks for your views on this ;)
and any links you can provide ;)
The SPA3000 and its successor the 3102 can do this with a suitable |
set-up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Borked Pseudo Mailed
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 5:02 pm Post subject: Re: VoIP Store |
|
|
<clavox@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:tkud53p8ugcvftflm33c5oj60dr81ibh84@4ax.com
| Quote: |
On 25 May 2007 07:44:15 -0700, astawerksdotcom
giftedwon@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings all,
I am just here to let everyone know about my site
www.astawerks.com We are based in the states but can
ship anywhere. We promise to bring you the lowest
prices on all of your VoIP Hardware needs such as
AASTRA, Digium, Sangoma and products from many more
companies.
So check us out at
http://www.astawerks.com
Whach out here comes more abuse from Ivor .
|
Oh do shut up. At least Ivor /sometimes/ posts useful information. I've never seen /anything/ even remotely useful from you.
KF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Brian A
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 10:05 pm Post subject: Re: VoIP Store |
|
|
On Fri, 25 May 2007 11:02:24 -0600 (MDT), Borked Pseudo Mailed
<nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
clavox@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:tkud53p8ugcvftflm33c5oj60dr81ibh84@4ax.com
On 25 May 2007 07:44:15 -0700, astawerksdotcom
giftedwon@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings all,
I am just here to let everyone know about my site
www.astawerks.com We are based in the states but can
ship anywhere. We promise to bring you the lowest
prices on all of your VoIP Hardware needs such as
AASTRA, Digium, Sangoma and products from many more
companies.
So check us out at
http://www.astawerks.com
Whach out here comes more abuse from Ivor .
Oh do shut up. At least Ivor /sometimes/ posts useful information. I've never seen /anything/ even remotely useful from you.
KF
I can see where Ivor is coming from in respect of maintaining good |
standards. However, I do not regard a single posting as spam. A single
posting is informative. It may be that a web site offers something
that people in this group find of interest.
I look at it this way. If someone sends me an email, that I didn't ask
for, it is spam and it is like someone coming into my house that I
don't want to be there. However, a single posting, on a newsgroup,
is just like a billboard. It is a public place. You wouldn't want too
many billboards spoiling the environment but the odd one here and
there is OK. It might not be the best analogy but hopefully you get my
drift.
Can we not agree that a single posting, for a web site, is acceptable.
I am not including postings of any ebay ads. made by some nuisance
people.
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 11:20 pm Post subject: Re: VoIP Store |
|
|
On Fri, 25 May 2007 18:05:41 GMT, Brian A
<no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Can we not agree that a single posting, for a web site, is acceptable.
|
It just has to be where else can one go to find all kinds of info
regarding voip all in one location if one doesn't like spam one
ignores it . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ivor Jones
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:06 pm Post subject: Re: providers and voip regulations |
|
|
"Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message
news:mn.128c7d76637eb0cd.48968@blueyonder.invalid
| Quote: |
on 02/06/2007, News Reader supposed :
(Aside: P.s. Hopefully a few less " / " 's now - for
those who have tried to help on that front ).
And there I was, about to admonish you in a different
thread, as I'd thought you'd forgotten. Nested brackets
are a little tricky to read too - like reading algebra!
:-)
|
RPN (Reverse Polish Notation) works well with those..! Although those old
HP calculators with it don't seem to be around now, more's the pity.
Ivor |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Paul Cupis
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:17 pm Post subject: Re: providers and voip regulations |
|
|
Ivor Jones wrote:
| Quote: |
"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:f3q9k4$no2$2@energise.enta.net
Tim wrote:
Ivor Jones wrote:
These "rules" you keep mentioning, can you summarise
them for me please..? What are they and why would a
company have to close for non-compliance..?
I can't find the relevant ofcom document, even though
I've read it recently.
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2007/03/nr_20070329
Thanks Paul.
That document states, amongst other things:
"The new code of practice requires VoIP providers to make clear:
a.. whether or not the service includes access to emergency services..."
This seems to me to mean that they must tell you whether or not you can
access emergency services, not that they *must* provide access.
Or am I reading it wrongly..?
|
No, you are correct. The regulations do not require VoIP operators to
provide 999/112 access, but they do require operators to make it very
clear to their users whether 999/112 is available - i.e. they must make
the customer aware that it is not supported if it is not.
Ofcom are considering further regulations to require access to 999/112
in the future. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Nick
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:26 pm Post subject: Re: Linksys SPA3102 FXO in Problems |
|
|
"Anonymous Sender" <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote in message
news:b576432ebd2697a98ee24f1e1ecb0dba@remailer.metacolo.com...
| Quote: |
shu3040@126.com> wrote in message
news:1180759442.909072.39590@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com
which platforn do you use?
Platform 2 usually, but sometimes it's platform 3, it depends
on whether anything's coming over the level crossing from the
other direction.
KF
|
The question was "which platforn do you use?"
Naff all to do with trains, trams or any other form of
transport that uses a platform area to embark or disembark. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Borked Pseudo Mailed
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 3:52 pm Post subject: Re: Linksys SPA3102 FXO in Problems |
|
|
Anonymous Sender" <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote in message
news:b576432ebd2697a98ee24f1e1ecb0dba@remailer.metacolo.com...
| Quote: |
shu3040@126.com> wrote in message
news:1180759442.909072.39590@j4g2000prf.googlegroups.com
which platforn do you use?
Platform 2 usually, but sometimes it's platform 3, it depends
on whether anything's coming over the level crossing from the
other direction.
KF
The question was "which platforn do you use?"
Naff all to do with trains, trams or any other form of
transport that uses a platform area to embark or disembark.
|
Sorry, missed that. What's a platforn then?
KF |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 5:48 pm Post subject: Re: providers and voip regulations |
|
|
On 1 Jun, 09:10, Peter Gradwell <p...@gradwell.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
meisad...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
On 31 May, 17:32, alexd <troffa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
meisad...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Afternoon I hope that someone on here could answer a couple of
questions for me
Either I am being dumb or I am completely missing something I have
been considering moving the telecoms for my business and home over to
VoIP for a while now and have spent the last month or so doing a lot
of reading and trying to weigh up what provider is going to be best
for me.
I am aware that new regulation for the VoIP industry came in to force
on the 29th of this month yet I have only been able to find 2
providers that seem to be adhering to these new lawswww.vonage.co.uk
andwww.voipfone.co.ukthislimits my options unless I am repaired to
take a chance on one of the companies that would seem to be NOT
sticking to the rules for examplewww.gradwell.com,www.voip.co.uk,
www.voiptalk.org,www.tescointernetphone.com,www.timico.co.uk
I'm quite confused as to why these regulations are being ignored by
the vast majority of VoIP providers is there not some sort of
regulatory body that is supposed to ensure that these rules and
regulations are adhered to or is it only offcom ? In addition, how can
these new laws just be ignored?
By its very nature [the "over IP" bit], you don't need to be in the UK to
operate a VoIP service targeting the UK.
Can anyone shed any light on this for me?
Perhaps you could refresh our memories by telling us what these regulations
are. And how you know that the organisations you've listed aren't complying
with them. And why you care. I've been using voip.co.uk for 8 months now,
seemingly without ill effect.
--
http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpE...@ale.cx)
17:27:54 up 32 days, 19:28, 2 users, load average: 1.10, 0.45, 0.31
09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
it would seem that providers were given 2 months to comply with the
new lawshttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/29/ofcom_voip/having
read through the regulations i can only see the two above mentioned
companies that are adhering to these laws
how are you determining whether or not we meet OFCOM's new criteria?
cheers
peter- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
Well i must assume that seeing as your asking this question you have
not read the regulation docs that were issued by offcom i find that a
little worrying in it own right.
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 5:54 pm Post subject: Re: providers and voip regulations |
|
|
On 1 Jun, 09:44, "Ivor Jones" <i...@despammed.invalid> wrote:
| Quote: |
meisad...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1180650279.263031.261310@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
[snip]
I think you are missing my point ivor.
The point I am trying to make is that I'm looking for a
provider that is law abiding and seen to be sticking to
the rules.
These "rules" you keep mentioning, can you summarise them for me please..?
What are they and why would a company have to close for non-compliance..?
From what I can see there are only two to choose from.
My question is
how can all these companies ignore what is now law? Are
offcom able to enforce these regulations? And if so would
this mean closure of any companies that do not comply?
Obviously not, as they're still around..! Again, please summarise.
I do not want to find that in 6 months time the provider
I have chosen has to close, I have lost my numbers, and
my business is affected.
Sipgate have been running for almost 3 years.
Ivor
|
look Ivor i am not an expert i am just passing comment on what i have
read of the last couple of months the way i understand it was new
regulations were issued march giving any voip company that provides UK
telephone number 2 months to comply or basically get out of the
business
These regulations became law on the 29th of may and from all of the
providers i have looked at only www.vonage.co.uk and www.voipfone.co.uk
seem to have taken these laws seriously and complied with the
regulations.
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
140 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
